Court says warrentless eavesdropping illegal

I'm not well versed in the law so I'll leave the elegant interpretation of the legal ruling to the lawyers. As a simple layman, I'm going to reduce my take on the whole thing down to four simple layman sentences:

1. Wireless eavesdropping isn't illegal... Warrentless wireless eavesdropping is illegal.
2. If eavesdropping is required for the sake of national security, get a warrent.
   
3. If technological advances have outgrown the law, it is the President's duty to lobby congress to change the law.
4. Until then, the law is still the law and every excuse for bypassing it is just so much bullshit.

Some 220 years ago, a group of patriots gave birth to the democratic principles on which this country is founded. They understood that all men are equal under the law and that no man is above the law. They envisioned a government of checks and balances that would ensure that the government remained responsible to the people and that its power would be limited. Many men were willing to die -- and have died -- for those ideas rather than see them compromised.

The pants wetting weenies who are so willing to excuse this blatant disregard for our constitution in the hope that Big Daddy is gonna use his unchecked power to keep them safer should be ashamed.

Update: The Editors makes me smile again, as usual. Founding Idiots, indeed!